Nine decks from the Fun files: a council briefing, a pilot pitch, a market read, a sales deck, a class, a case study and the thinking behind them.
Four follow El Paso’s incentive deals and the Meta campus, from who builds the data center to why a public-records request cost $1,500. One reads Meta’s new AI agent the week it went big. One sells a first step in B2B analysis, one runs an afternoon class that ends with a film, and two set out the ideas underneath.
Every slide is on this page.
Press the F to see a deck.
A readiness audit built for one council member. The Meta campus needs 53–71% of El Paso’s entire electrical-contracting workforce at once, and the county trains 32 electricians a year.
Built to survive forwarding: every figure sourced, no one cast as a villain, and the two questions the record couldn’t answer reported as unanswered.
Meta’s new AI agent, read the week it went big: what’s fun, what isn’t, what 2.5 million downloads mean for AI adoption, and whether it’ll be out for the holidays.
Every claim carries its source on the slide. The not-fun list comes from the reviewers, not from us.
Where AI in B2B actually starts: not good vs. great analysis, but some vs. none. The competitor is inertia, and the offer is one question, one dataset, one answer, one week.
Written to be left behind after the meeting. It says what we won’t sell as plainly as what we will.
The run of show for a hands-on AI video class: story, character, a shot plan with Claude, permission, and a lineup where everyone’s character meets. Everyone leaves with a film.
Every example is from a real film on the reel. The frames on the slides are the frames the method made.
One public-records request, followed through five failures: a $1,440 fee, a waiver never ruled on, a request closed by silence, and two justifications for the same 80 hours.
Each failure is tied to the statute it tests, and it ends in seven reforms the city can adopt without waiting on Austin.
A 30-minute briefing for city management. The city’s own auditors found five control gaps, and the reform stops at the data-center door. The ask is a ten-agreement pilot.
The first line of the pitch is that no one broke a law. What’s proven is stated flatly, and the dollar figure is the smaller, defensible one.
Governance isn’t the problem; the absence of it is. A nine-frame argument for the person willing to make the system visible.
Built as a LinkedIn carousel: one idea per frame, one question at the foot of each.
Why work should be built as assets that compound instead of expenses that evaporate, and why only shipped assets count.
Six slides, one engine, five fronts: the operating thesis behind the rest of this page.
El Paso’s path from the 2024 audit findings to the 2026 data-center framework: what changed, what didn’t, and why the Meta agreement stayed.
Reads as a timeline an aide can brief from: one year per slide, then the standards, the mechanisms and the outlook.
1 · Council briefing
Aug 2026 · 12 slides
El Paso · August 2026
A readiness audit of El Paso’s skilled-trades workforce and contracting capacity, measured against the announced Meta / BlackRock campus.
Prepared by Luis Ruiz · Fun
Findings only. No engagement is being proposed and no fee is attached to any of it.
The announcement
1 GW
final capacity
operational 2028
$10B
Meta investment
$12B bond, BlackRock-led
4,000+
construction workers
at peak
300
permanent jobs
once operational
The load ramp is on the regulatory record
2026 · approved
220 MW
2027 · projected
440 MW
2029 · projected
1,000 MW
Bridge generation
McCloud Generation — 366 MW across 813 modular gas generators, adjacent to the site, exclusive to the campus for an initial five-year bridge period from 2027 and separate from El Paso Electric’s transmission system.
Sources: Meta newsroom announcement, 21 July 2026 · El Paso Electric filing with the Public Utility Commission of Texas.
Fun · Who builds the data center?02
The question
This audit does not ask whether the campus is good for El Paso.
It asks a narrower question that has an answer:
Two things follow from the announcement itself: the peak workforce is a published number, and the dates are filed. That makes readiness measurable rather than a matter of opinion.
Fun · Who builds the data center?03
Method
Four design choices, made so the findings can be checked rather than taken on trust.
01
Every threshold was written down and dated before collection ran. The rules file is checksummed into each report, so a reader can confirm the test was not fitted to the result.
02
Findings are measured against Abilene, where a comparable buildout already happened and the outcome is documented — not against an abstract standard.
03
Where the public record cannot answer a question, the audit says so. Missing evidence is never counted toward the conclusion and never treated as zero.
04
All findings come from federal sources — the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the federal education data system — each carrying its source and retrieval date.
Fun · Who builds the data center?04
Finding one · The arithmetic
Electricians are roughly 30–40% of data centre construction craft. Against a published peak of 4,000 workers, that is 1,200–1,600 electricians at the same time.
2,263
people employed in electrical and wiring contracting in El Paso County
173
establishments — an average of 13 employees each
An average establishment of 13 employees is a residential and light commercial firm. Data centre electrical scope is self-performed by contractors an order of magnitude larger — which is a separate question from whether the workers exist.
Share of the county’s entire electrical contracting workforce required by one project
53%
at 30% trade share
71%
at 40% trade share
The denominator is the whole sector, including everyone already committed to residential and commercial work. It is a ceiling on available local labour, not a pool of idle workers.
Source: BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, El Paso County, NAICS 23821, 2025 Q4.
Fun · Who builds the data center?05
Finding two · The pipeline
vs
Spread generously over the three years from announcement to operation, the annual requirement is 400–533. Local programmes cover 6–8% of it.
This is a floor, not a ceiling: it counts degree-granting institutions only and excludes union and merit-shop apprenticeships.
Source: IPEDS completions, El Paso County institutions, CIP 46.0302, 2023–24 award year.
Fun · Who builds the data center?06
Finding three · The control case
Abilene · before the Stargate ramp
1.36%
of all private employment was in electrical contracting
What followed:
El Paso · today, before its ramp
0.83%
of all private employment is in electrical contracting
0.61×
El Paso enters the same curve with roughly six-tenths the trade density of the metro where the labour market was documented as breaking.
Source: BLS QCEW, Taylor County (2023 Q4) and El Paso County (2025 Q4), NAICS 23821, as a share of total private employment.
Fun · Who builds the data center?07
The limits of the public record
Both concern whether any of this is enforceable. Neither could be answered, because the records are not public.
Insufficient evidence
Prime and subcontract awards for the campus are not published, so local participation cannot be measured. The firm-size distribution needed to judge whether local contractors could hold the scope is also unavailable.
Insufficient evidence
The operative incentive agreement text is not in the public record reviewed, so it cannot be tested for local-hire terms, apprenticeship requirements, wage floors, reporting duties, or clawbacks.
The audit does not treat a gap in the record as evidence for its own conclusion. Both questions are reported as unanswered, and both are now the subject of records requests.
Fun · Who builds the data center?08
Why the gap matters
The two that could not are precisely the two about whether anything is enforceable.
| Answered | Is the demand real, dated and sized? | Yes — filed with the PUC |
| Answered | Is the local trades workforce large enough? | No — 53–71% of the sector |
| Answered | Is the training pipeline scaled to it? | No — 6–8% of annual need |
| Unanswered | Can local firms capture the work? | Awards not published |
| Unanswered | Is there binding local-hire language? | Agreement text not public |
Fun · Who builds the data center?09
Filed
Both were filed with the City through the Public Information Center on 13 August 2026 and acknowledged the same afternoon.
W211728-081326
The incentive agreement and amendments; contractor and subcontractor lists; local participation requirements and reporting; permits with contractor of record; economic impact assumptions.
W211732-081326
The executed agreement and exhibits; any local-hire, apprenticeship, or wage terms; compliance reports filed to date; clawback provisions; the department responsible for monitoring.
Statutory response
27
August 2026
The tenth business day after filing, under Chapter 552 of the Texas Government Code.
A third request went to Workforce Solutions Borderplex for apprenticeship registrations — the data most likely to revise the training-pipeline finding upward.
Fun · Who builds the data center?10
What would close the gap
The Community Benefits Agreement is where workforce terms either get written or don’t. These are the elements the audit tests for — offered as drafting considerations, not as proposed final text.
A stated share, with a defined geographic hiring area.
A required share of hours worked by registered apprentices.
Prevailing wage or a stated floor, named explicitly.
How often, in what form, and by whom — named in the agreement.
A verifier independent of both the City and the recipient.
A defined consequence — recapture, reduction, or termination.
A commitment with no reporting duty and no consequence attached counts as absent for this test, however it is worded.
Fun · Who builds the data center?11
Verification
Every figure carries its source, its identifier, and the date it was retrieved. The thresholds were fixed and dated before collection. Anyone can re-run the analysis and obtain the same result, or apply different thresholds and see what changes.
BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, El Paso and Taylor Counties, NAICS 23821, 2019–2025
IPEDS completions, El Paso County institutions, CIP 46.0302, 2019–20 to 2023–24
Meta newsroom announcement, 21 July 2026; El Paso Electric filing with the Public Utility Commission of Texas
Contemporaneous reporting on the Stargate campus, Taylor County, 2024–26
Luis Ruiz · Fun · luis@funistheproduct.com | Findings only. No engagement is being proposed and no fee is attached to any of it. This is governance-audit analysis, not legal advice.
Fun · Who builds the data center?12
2 · Market read
Sep 2026 · 12 slides
Fun · Release notes · September 2026
What’s fun, what isn’t, and what Meta’s new AI agent means for AI adoption.
Luis Ruiz · Fun · luis@funistheproduct.com
The release
Sept 8 · Launch
A personal AI agent you text or talk to. It works in the background across your email, calendar, browser and shopping, then reports back.
iPhone, Android, web, Mac and WhatsApp. U.S. only, 18 and up. Free to start, with paid plans for heavier use.
Sept 23 · Meta Connect
Sources: Meta Newsroom, Sept 2026 · Meta, Everything We Announced at Connect 2026
Fun · Is Muse fun?02
Downloads in about two weeks
2.5 million
902,000 in the first six days. The No. 1 free app on the U.S. App Store, ahead of ChatGPT and Claude.
Sources: Sensor Tower via Bloomberg, Sept 21 · CNBC, Sept 21, 2026
Fun · Is Muse fun?03
What’s fun
The fun is in how it feels. You hand off an errand the way you’d text a friend who’s good at this stuff.
Fun · Is Muse fun?04
What’s fun
01
Voice mode holds a long conversation while Muse does the task in the background.
02
Say what needs doing. It works across your email, calendar, browser and stores, then reports back.
03
The Muse app, WhatsApp, the web or a Mac. No new habit to learn first.
04
Describe the voice you want: faster, slower, even a specific accent.
Sources: Meta Newsroom · Meta, Everything We Announced at Connect 2026
Fun · Is Muse fun?05
What’s not fun
The catch: Muse works better the more of your life it can reach, and reviewers say it keeps asking for more.
Fun · Is Muse fun?06
What’s not fun
Wired’s reviewer was pushed, again and again, to connect an email inbox and banking.
Your chats can help train Meta’s AI unless you switch that setting off.
An Inc. reviewer found Muse reading private messages nobody asked it to read.
Wired’s verdict: it put learning about the user ahead of finishing the task.
Sources: Wired (Reece Rogers) · Inc. (Jason Aten) · Meta Newsroom
Fun · Is Muse fun?07
Meta’s answer
Muse runs in its own isolated machine, with your data stored apart.
A second agent has to approve anything Muse sends to the internet.
Your logins sit where Muse can use them but never read them.
A running record of everything it did and plans to do.
Confidential VM, encrypted with keys only you hold.
This is serious engineering. The question left is trust: you’re still giving Meta the run of your email, calendar and browser.
Sources: Meta Newsroom · Meta Help Center · eesel AI, Muse review
Fun · Is Muse fun?08
The Fun take
Play needs a boundary. Here are three that keep Muse fun.
01
Give it one job this week, not your whole life. Add access when a task needs it.
02
Decide whether your chats help train Meta’s AI before you connect anything.
03
The audit trail shows what it did and what it plans to do. Read it like a bank statement.
Fun · Is Muse fun?09
What it means for AI adoption
| How AI is usually sold | How Muse is sold |
|---|---|
| Do more with fewer people | A friend who handles things |
| Learn to write prompts | Text it like a person |
| Another app to master | Lives in WhatsApp |
| Productivity software | Something to talk to |
That’s the Fun thesis out in the wild. AI adoption stalls when it’s sold as subtraction. It takes off when life gets more interesting.
Fun · Is Muse fun?10
What it means for AI adoption
2.5 million people tried Muse. The number that matters is how many still let it into their inbox, calendar and wallet after the holidays. Every item on the not-fun list is a reason to disconnect.
Fun · Is Muse fun?11
The question everyone’s asking
The app, yes. The Charm, maybe. Muse on glasses, not yet.
| Product | What Meta has said | Our read |
|---|---|---|
| Muse app | Out since Sept 8 on phone, web, Mac and WhatsApp. U.S. only, 18 and up. | Yes. It’s already here. |
| Muse Charm | Zuckerberg wants it ready to ship for the holidays. No price yet. Not in mass production; only a few units built. | Maybe. A target, not a date. |
| Muse on Meta glasses | Coming in the next few months, with no date given. | Not yet. Don’t gift glasses expecting Muse. |
Sources: Meta Connect 2026 recap · iThinkDiff · CNBC · checked Sept 24, 2026
Fun · Is Muse fun?12
3 · Sales deck
Sep 2026 · 10 slides
Fun · AI for B2B
Where AI in B2B actually starts: not good vs. great analysis, but some vs. none.
Luis Ruiz · Fun · luis@funistheproduct.com · September 2026
The call gets made by whoever is most confident in the meeting.
Built once for a question nobody asks anymore. Still on the wall.
The data exists. The question was never asked of it.
Fun · Some vs. none02
What vendors pitch
“Our model is more accurate than theirs.” Assumes you already have analysis to improve.
What buyers actually face
Any honest look at the data beats the decision made without one.
Fun · Some vs. none03
Directionally right in ten minutes is a win over never done.
Fun · Some vs. none04
| Why buyers stall | What we do about it |
|---|---|
| Starting feels expensive | Make the first step small and fixed-fee |
| Nobody knows where to begin | We pick the one question worth asking first |
| “Our data isn’t ready” | Start with the dataset you already have |
| AI projects never seem to end | One answer, one week, then decide |
Fun · Some vs. none05
1
The decision you’re about to make without data.
1
Whatever you already have. No migration, no cleanup project.
1
A written finding you can act on or argue with.
1
Fixed scope, fixed fee. Credited if you continue.
Fun · Some vs. none06
Not “your analysts got 30% faster.” Instead: here’s what you couldn’t see before.
Accounts drifting before they cancel.
Where you’re leaving money, or customers, on the table.
Budget going to things nobody checked.
Fun · Some vs. none07
With nothing to compare against, you can’t tell if the answer is right. So every finding comes with its receipts.
Exactly which data it came from.
What we took as given, written down.
How sure we are, and what would change our mind.
Fun · Some vs. none08
What we won’t sell
We sell the finding and the method behind it. What you do with it is yours. That’s not a hedge. It’s why you can trust the answer.
Fun · Some vs. none09
Next step
We’ll bring back one answer, with the work shown, in a week.
Luis Ruiz · Fun
luis@funistheproduct.com
4 · Class deck
Sep 2026 · 16 slides
Fun · AI video class · El Paso
Plan it before you render it.
A hands-on class in five parts. Everyone leaves with a finished short film.
Luis Ruiz · Fun · luis@funistheproduct.com
Why this class
The first image was great. In the second shot, it was a different person.
You spent your credits finding out what the tool can’t do.
It looks like AI because nothing in it was decided.
This class fixes all three by deciding before anyone presses render.
Fun · AI video class02
The class
0:00
One sentence, three beats, no images yet.
0:20
A card, a turnaround sheet, a lock.
1:00
A timed shot plan. Then render.
1:45
Whose face, whose place, whose idea.
2:05
Trade characters. Share a scene. Join the lineup.
2:45
Everything made in the room, on the big screen.
Fun · AI video class03
Part 01 · Story
A grandmother’s exoskeleton comes online, piece by piece.
Legs · suit-up reveal
He didn’t ask for it. He hasn’t taken it off.
Still in Office · character reveal
Ten characters at one casting call. The judge looks up once.
The Audition · lineup
Still in Office · 15 seconds
A chimp mugging in a crown is a greeting card. A chimp putting up with one is a portrait.
Fun · AI video class04
Part 02 · Character design
Controlled and precise. Four angles, one face.
The chipped tooth is the detail the model holds on to.
The chrome hand and the red lens carry him from shot to shot.
Fun · AI video class05
Part 02 · Character design
Anise Baca · reference
Models drift, even with a reference image attached. So every card ends in a lock: a short paragraph pasted into every prompt with that character in it.
From the card · Anise Baca, Legs
ANISE BACA (CIVILIAN) — LOCK: Mexican-American woman, mid-60s, trim and upright posture, deep-set dark eyes, dark brown hair silver-white at the temples in a low chignon, small chemical-burn scar inside left forearm, cream/camel/soft-grey tailoring. Use the attached reference sheet as strict visual anchor. No redesigns.
Vague words get generic pictures. Anise’s first suit came back with a spiked helmet and blade fins. The next three suits each got one specific anchor, a single crest or fin from a named animal, and came back clean.
Fun · AI video class06
Part 03 · Plan with Claude
From the plan · Legs, the running take
0.00–1.00s Static hold. Civilian Anise.
1.00–11.00s One continuous take: running + full assembly.
11.00–13.00s Hero hold on the final frame.
13.00–15.00s LEGS title card.
Step 2 of 5: “Leg struts snap into place along the outer thigh and shin mid-stride, locking at hip, knee and ankle with a flash of pale-blue light. Real rehabilitation hardware, never wing-like or blade-like.”
Legs · 15 seconds
The film that plan made.
Fun · AI video class07
Part 03 · Plan with Claude
The Legs run is one ten-second take. Most tools stop at 8 to 10 seconds. Plan: render at the maximum, extend from the last frame.
An earlier cut had three beats under two seconds. Plan: render at the minimum, trim from the front so the pose still matches.
An Amigo Man teaser packed a voiceover, a power cut and a spoken line into two seconds. The establishing shot gave up a second.
Two locked characters sharing a close-up blur together. Test that on a cheap shot before you build a scene on it.
Fun · AI video class08
Part 04 · Permission
Every card opens with one line: real person, yes or no. The answer sends the character down one of two roads.
Face-lock tools learn from 20 or more photos of one person, so that person is now in your film. Your own face is fine. Anyone else needs a written yes that says where it will be shown. Famous faces are off the table.
Built from words, not photos. A reference photo can set a style, a wardrobe or a neighborhood. It can’t be one real person with the name changed. Invented means invented.
Fun · AI video class09
Part 04 · Permission
Amigo Man is El Paso’s real civic mascot, and he has an owner. My Amigo Man films stay parody. A paid version starts with a license.
The Audition’s wall is a real building with real artists’ murals. The frames invent their own art, with no readable words.
Each project keeps a ledger: the author’s idea, or an AI proposal waiting to be picked. Nothing goes in until a person chooses.
The class teaches good practice, not law. Anything headed for commercial use gets a lawyer’s read first.
Fun · AI video class10
Part 05 · Collaboration
Your character meets mine.
Fun · AI video class11
Part 05 · Collaboration
Natalia and Bertha · showdown
Beto, from Legs, challenges Natalia to a game of HORSE under the interstate. Natalia and Bertha play tug-of-war with a rope that isn’t there.
The rules of the trade
Nobody redesigns your character but you.
Whose character is whose, in every shared shot.
Who came up with the scene, the gag, the ending.
Fun · AI video class12
Part 05 · The finale
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
In The Audition
Ten characters from different projects stand against one wall, paper numbers pinned to their chests. A chimp in a costume crown walks the line while each performs one trick. He looks up only once.
In class
The class ends the same way. Every character in the room gets one beat in the lineup, and we screen it together before anyone goes home.
Fun · AI video class13
What everyone leaves with
01
The card, the turnaround sheet and the lock.
02
Written with Claude, beat by beat.
03
10 to 15 seconds, made in the room.
04
Made with a partner, both characters intact.
05
The class film, with everyone in it.
06
Whose face, whose place, whose brand, who made what.
Fun · AI video class14
Format
Set with whoever hosts: the group, the venue, the day
Up to 12–16, so every character gets a beat in the lineup
One 3-hour session, or two 90-minute sessions
Quoted per group
Their own free tiers, or a class account per head
A laptop. No experience required.
Fun · AI video class15
luis@funistheproduct.com
Fun · El Paso
5 · Case study
Jun 2026 · 11 slides
A case study in public records failure
A Case Study in Public Records Failure
Luis Ruiz · Fun · June 9, 2026
Broken by Design
On April 29, 2026, the Borderplex Ledger filed a six-part TPIA request seeking records on how El Paso approved a $10 billion Meta data center under the name of a shell entity, Wurldwide LLC.
What followed illustrates a records process that fails at every point where the law leaves the city discretion — and fails in one direction: against disclosure.
The city priced access at $1,500. It never ruled on the fee-waiver request. It closed the request as “withdrawn” without confirming the requestor received the cost estimate. And it offered two inconsistent justifications for the largest line item — contradicting its own cost rules.
Fun · Broken by Design02
Background
December 2023
Council approves Chapter 380 agreement with Wurldwide LLC. Meta connection not disclosed.
October 2025
Groundbreaking held. Project announced at fraction of eventual scope.
April 2026
Full scope becomes public: ~$10 billion across five phases.
June 9, 2026
After nearly 200 comments, Council votes to keep agreement. Attendees chant “vote them out.”
Deal terms: 80% city tax break for 35 years · $12.5M in public improvements · 7-year completion deadline
Fun · Broken by Design03
Filed: April 29, 2026
City cost estimate
$1,440 (80 hrs attorney)
$45 (IT locate/copy)
$16.50 (computer)
Requestor report
Never received estimate
Requested
Fee waiver (public benefit)
Fun · Broken by Design04
Failure 1
Texas Government Code § 552.267 requires a governmental body to provide copies without charge if disclosure primarily benefits the general public.
The request invoked this provision explicitly. Records concern use of public tax incentives on the largest private development in city history.
The city never issued a determination — not a denial, not a grant, nothing.
A waiver provision that is never ruled on is functionally repealed.
Fun · Broken by Design05
Failure 2
Early May
City generates estimate. Requestor reports never receiving it.
Mid-May
Request closed as “withdrawn.” No delivery confirmation. No second notice.
May 21
Requestor learns of charge. Request already dead.
The statute keys to sending, not receipt. The city closed based on assumed receipt with no safeguard for distinguishing whether the estimate was emailed-and-missed or never sent. The requestor first learned of the charge after the request was already dead.
Fun · Broken by Design06
Failure 3
May 26: First justification
Charge is to “make sure they correspond in regard to your request” — filtering for responsiveness.
Chargeability: allowed (locate & compile)
May 27: Second justification
Same 80 hours needed “to know which ones need to go to the AG’s office” — determining which require AG ruling.
Chargeability: prohibited (legal review)
The estimate commingles chargeable and non-chargeable labor — making audit impossible.
Fun · Broken by Design07
Failure 4
Request 6 seeks City Attorney records about prior requestor activity.
The office whose conduct is the subject is the same office that charges and reviews withholding.
El Paso has no recusal protocol for self-referential requests.
Failure 5
Every document sought concerns public money and resources.
None was published proactively.
To access: know “Wurldwide LLC,” file request, navigate fees, front $1,500.
Fun · Broken by Design08
The pattern
Each step is defensible in isolation. That is precisely the point.
A process whose every default favors opacity does not need bad actors to produce cover-up outcomes.
Fun · Broken by Design09
Reform recommendations
R1
Proactive disclosure — publish Chapter 380 agreements within 10 business days
R2
Beneficial-ownership disclosure — no vote on undisclosed shells
R3
Independent records function — move administration out of City Attorney’s Office
R4
Written fee-waiver determinations — all requests decided in writing within 10 days
R5
No closure without confirmation — delivery-confirmed estimates + second notice
R6
Auditable estimates — itemize chargeable vs. non-chargeable labor by activity
R7
Public records dashboard — quarterly publication of requests, fees, waivers, closures
Fun · Broken by Design10
And failed in one direction: against disclosure.
These reforms are adoptable by the city without waiting on Austin.
Fun · Broken by Design11
6 · Pilot pitch
Jul 2026 · 7 slides
Briefing for El Paso City Management & Audit
Luis Ruiz · Fun · July 8, 2026
The ask
A scoped pilot that verifies whether the October 2025 fixes closed gaps.
Your documents, no system access.
30 minutes now.
Fun · 380 Governance Audit Pilot02
Five significant findings, April 17, 2024 (City’s own audit)
| Finding | The number |
|---|---|
| Financial-stability verification weakened from “must include evidence” to “upon request”; mandatory annual Council report removed | Policy, 2021 |
| Files lacking documented financial analysis | 6 of 7 sampled (85.72%) |
| Fee waivers + TIRZ omitted from Council reporting | ~$1.22M unreported (~22%) |
| Reimbursements processed late, no documented authorization | 3 of 5 (60%), 2–5 months |
| Incentives unrecoverable | $1.35M, no recapture clause |
Fun · 380 Governance Audit Pilot03
The Hunt Metro 31 case
Recapture triggered ONLY on failure to ‘substantially complete any component’
Completed horizontal infrastructure ($1.43M paid). Terminated before retail/civic/residential. Completed ‘any component’ = foreclosed clawback. Legal.
This is not a bribe. It’s a clause that produced the outcome of a bribe with nobody breaking a rule.
That’s a design problem. Design problems get fixed by rewriting the design — a governance job, not a prosecution.
Fun · 380 Governance Audit Pilot04
Being reformed
Future hyperscale data centers. Draft framework, no future incentives, Meta CBA.
What A2023-07 examined
Hotels, retail, logistics, manufacturing, telecom, office towers, mixed-use. NOT data centers.
The gap
85.72%, ~22%, 60%, $1.35M all came from ordinary 380 agreements — outside reform scope.
Fun · 380 Governance Audit Pilot05
Promised vs. delivered
Reporting that reconciles to reality
Who drafts the accountability clause
10 agreements. 5 pre-reform (re-audit), 5 post-October-2025 (test fixes). Three weeks. Findings in A2023-07 format.
Fun · 380 Governance Audit Pilot06
1
Green-light the 10-agreement pilot
2
Name a point of contact for document requests
3
Three weeks: pilot findings report + read-out
4
Discuss standing independent-audit function for all 380 agreements
luis@funistheproduct.com
Fun · 380 Governance Audit Pilot07
7 · Thesis carousel
Jul 2026 · 9 slides
Fig. 01 — The setup
The absence of governance is.
“Most organizations have a villain. It’s not a person. It’s a system designed so no single person can be held accountable. The benevolent asshole is the only character willing to make the system visible.”
Swipe through if you think governance is boring. It’s not. →
Fun · Governance as Antagonist01 / 09
Fig. 02 — The antagonist
Without governance
With governance
Which sounds more like your organization right now?
Fun · Governance as Antagonist02 / 09
Fig. 03 — The archetype
The benevolent asshole is defined by a contradiction: outward behavior abrasive, core actions decent, protective, right.
In governance, they’re the one who:
Nobody likes them. Everyone needs them.
Does your organization have a benevolent asshole? If not, who’s making your system visible?
Fun · Governance as Antagonist03 / 09
Fig. 04 — Real example
01 · The deal
02 · The problem
03 · The lesson
“The contract wasn’t weak because the city forgot to tighten it. The contract was weak because the developer’s lawyer drafted it, and nobody with real power said ‘no.’”
Your contracts — who writes them? The person who benefits most from loopholes, or someone accountable for the outcome?
Fun · Governance as Antagonist04 / 09
Fig. 05 — The pattern
1 · Capture
→
2 · Theater
→
3 · Invisibility
→
4 · Repeat
↺
The benevolent asshole who won’t participate in the theater — questions the contract, asks who enforces it, makes visible what everyone wanted hidden. Stops the cycle. At least once.
What makes your governance theater vs. real? Who decides?
Fun · Governance as Antagonist05 / 09
Fig. 06 — Governance ≠ accountability
Governance
Accountability
The trap
Organizations build governance (looks good) without accountability (costs authority). Then they hire consultants to add “more governance.” What they actually need: someone empowered to enforce what was promised.
Does your organization have governance? Sure. Does it have accountability? That’s the question.
Fun · Governance as Antagonist06 / 09
Fig. 07 — The toolkit
The benevolent asshole
The system they build
Which of these does your organization actually have?
Fun · Governance as Antagonist07 / 09
Fig. 08 — The cost
The reality
But
Is your organization paying someone — enough — to be the benevolent asshole? Or hoping nobody notices when governance fails?
Fun · Governance as Antagonist08 / 09
Fig. 09 — Your move
A
B
“Which costs more — a benevolent asshole who prevents capture, or a system that captures itself?”
Drop your take in the comments. Which is your organization? And if you’re the benevolent asshole — who’s got your back? Email your take: luis@funistheproduct.com
Fun · Governance as Antagonist09 / 09
8 · House thesis
Jul 2026 · 6 slides
Fun · Brain 2.0 · The house thesis
“Compounding assets that never depreciate for a system that’s one; but the fronts are many.”
Contextual provenance //
Establishing a governed operational architecture that freezes legacy processes, converting evaporating efforts into insurable, compoundable corporate assets.
Version: v1.0
Date: July 17, 2026
Author: Luis Ruiz · Fun
Fun · Brain 2.0
Status quo // The leaky bucket
Most marketing is treated strictly as an expense. The campaign runs, money evaporates, and next month starts back at zero.
✕ System resets daily
The titled stack // Governed capital
A governed system with permanent memory translates every work product, quote library, and design record into titled, valuable corporate property.
✓ Active compounding
Author: Luis Ruiz · Fun02
Fun · Brain 2.0
| Front | Target buyer | The compounding move |
|---|---|---|
| Provenance Films | Brokers, financiers, sponsors | “Every film we touch becomes the sales demo for the tier it was certified under” — the slate is the GTM. |
| Writer’s Second Brain | Writers, creators | Living canon + authorship ledger: drafts become titled, highly certifiable IP. |
| Vesterly | Local verticals (dental, derm, law) | The overarching thesis applied directly to their specific local commerce: pile → asset. |
| El Conduit | Santa Teresa / regional dev | Strategic connector position won in Year One, compounding institutional memory thereafter. |
| Training / Curriculum | Public, journalists, city groups | The conversion engine — buyers experience the productivity of the core within one single hour. |
Author: Luis Ruiz · Fun03
Fun · Brain 2.0
01 / The founder scale
Running multiple companies forces severe context-switching. A stateful engine makes a decision made once propagate globally.
Collateral defended:
Company valuations rest on documented, transferable records, not founder recall. Context is protected.
02 / Institutional scale
Trusted broker credibility is compromised by stale data. A sourced corpus turns recruitments and asks into retrievable knowledge.
Collateral defended:
Decades of regional credibility preserved; memory survives any sudden staff or leadership departures.
03 / Compliance scale
AS9100 and ITAR demand strict traceability. A governed engine allows AI adoption with proven, clean design provenance.
Collateral defended:
Audit-ready revision logs; validation required to acquire and execute highly profitable prime contracts.
Author: Luis Ruiz · Fun04
The 3-act process (Module Zero)
1
Your existing PDFs, spreadsheets, and legacy databases encode your unclaimed IP.
2
Inventory before organizing, mine workflows, and build a customized constitution.
3
Once converted, every subsequent hour worked adds directly to an appreciating system.
Author: Luis Ruiz · Fun05
Unshipped material is not capital; it is a liability that depreciates. It accumulates physical and mental friction, sitting idle as a stagnant, static pile.
Unshipped inventory ✕ Depreciation
Compounding is initiated only upon delivery. Showing active, audited ledgers triggers the follow-up heartbeat—the core mechanism the entire thesis depends upon.
Shipped velocity ✓ Accumulation
Author: Luis Ruiz · Fun06
9 · Policy timeline
Jul 2026 · 10 slides
From 2024 audit findings to 2026 transparency reforms
Luis Ruiz · Fun01
2024
Internal control breakdowns
Governance legacy
The city’s prior administration favored administrative “shortcuts,” utilizing shell entities and NDAs to bypass mandatory impact disclosures.
Fun · Economic Governance Evolution02
2025
Corrective actions
Challenges to reform
Transitioning from “liability management” to “accountability” proved complex, requiring legislative review beyond initial January targets.
Fun · Economic Governance Evolution03
2026
Following February 2026 mandates, the City Council approved a new comprehensive framework for hyperscale projects, leaving 380 agreements untouched
Public engagement
2,300+
public comments and six community meetings.
Legislative shift
Moving from “by-right” to “Special Permit” requirements for all large-load facilities.
Fun · Economic Governance Evolution04
| Category | New standard |
|---|---|
| Water | Mandatory impact analysis for all large-load projects. |
| Energy | Strict demand protections for residential ratepayers. |
| Environmental | Full review of noise, lighting, and wastewater impacts. |
Fun · Economic Governance Evolution05
Governance now centers on audit-grade logic models, removing the ability to “game” systemic reporting through shell entities.
Required parent-company commitments. Strict utility cost protections preventing residential rate hikes.
Fun · Economic Governance Evolution06
The new framework eliminates future local economic incentives for data centers, replacing them with:
Fun · Economic Governance Evolution07
The 2026 policy framework applies to future projects. The existing Meta data center remains under its original 2023 agreement.
City leaders emphasize that maintaining current commitments is a necessary risk-management decision to protect taxpayer litigation exposure.
Fun · Economic Governance Evolution08
Three-phase plan
Year 1
Foundation (Policies)
Year 2
Growth (Implementation)
Year 3
Sustainability
Core values
Collaboration, trust, equality, and radical transparency in all economic development endeavors.
Fun · Economic Governance Evolution09
Vision summary & future direction
Fun · Economic Governance Evolution10
Order